Answers ( 19 )

  1. If you’re a beginner, you might as well learn how to do it properly first up.

    After becoming competent with building on Oxygen you will become MUCH more knowledgeable than people who have been building with other builders for years, simply because Oxygen forces you to get things right from the beginning.

    You will learn about classes, CSS, building a theme and using woo commerce, and when you are done, you’ll know that there is nothing you can’t build.

    All other builders are limited by the very fact that they require a theme and every theme has limitations.

    Oxygen gives you freedom. It takes a little longer to learn initially, but it’s still faster than doing it wrong and trying to work around a theme’s limitations.

  2. Elementor is great if you’re a beginner or just want to quickly and efficiently build a site.
    Oxygen is great if you want more advanced capabilities using JS, PHP, Divs, etc
    Oxygen is far more lightweight since it doesn’t use themes and only uses whatever resource it needs to render your website

    Elementor is very easier comparing to Oxygen Builder and content is king from the SEO perspective.

    The problem with Oxygen is the learning curve. Difficult for someone with some web awareness – but for sure difficult for our clients with zero web experience. And that’s the real problem – too difficult for our clients to use to update their content.

    Get Your Copy Of Elementor Pro Now and Have No Regrets

  3. I use Elementor Pro and since last week have a lifetime Oxygen License. The more I get to know Oxygen, the more I love it. In my opinion Elementor pro is more like a MS Office program and Oxygen is more like a Adobe program. Both outstanding, but one will use them in different manners and they have both different approach and expertise. However as a professional in design, one would rather choose Adobe or Oxygen because they give far more in dept possibilities.

  4. We trialed both Elementor and Oxygen a couple of months ago, this to rebuild our existing property websites. Now to be fair, we have very much specific needs regards layouts and functions.

    We purchased Ox and tried to replicate a property listing page…it wasn’t easy to create a multi image, dynamic carousel. We gave up on this in the end. We tried to create other pages using Toolset and dynamic content. While this worked ok it really did feel like we were having to rethink a lot of options because Ox lacks features. Sure you can code them in yourself or start loading plugins. We gave up in the end.

    Everything with Oxygen took much longer to create.

    We now use the Hello Theme and Elementor Pro, this with Toolset and a few other plugins. Elementor does pretty much everything we need, is much lighter than Divi (our existing sites use this) and while we may need to code a few things ourselves, Elementor was right for us.

    Visit Elementor For More Info

    The above based on our requirements. Hope this helps

    Take A Look At Other Elementor Related Questions and Answers.

    Best SEO Plugin for elementor Page Builder?

    White Screen Of Death elementor!

    elementor Pro Vs Beaver Builder?

    Divi Vs elementor Vs WPBakery Page Builder? Which One Is The Best WordPress Website Builder?

    Best WordPress Cache Plugin For elementor Page Builder?

    Can I Use elementor With Genesis

  5. Oxygen vs Elementor vs Beaver vs Divi:

    You can design and build your own websites with Oxygen, whereas Elementar, just like Divi, heavily relies on templates and pre-made elements. Currently, there is no tool I know of on the level of Oxygen in the WordPress space. Outside the comparable apps are Webflow and Pinegrow. Oxygen plays in a higher league than Elementor. You can actually create something from scratch, following your own rules. You don’t have to use templates. It’s like the difference between cooking (Oxygen) and warming up ready-made-meals in a microwave (Elementor). Try customising the navigation in Divi. You have to do a lot of reverse engineering. Everything in Divi and Elementor has presets defined. You end up spending a lot of time removing or suppressing these default presets. I never had that in Oxygen. I could always start with a completely blank slate

  6. Elementor is way easier than Oxygen. As for speed, it depends on how you build your site, mine always keep it loads under 2sec. As for SEO, content is king.

    I came back from oxygen to Elementor because my clients use to break the oxygen sites. Oxygen is very powerful, but still full of bugs after 2 years of working with it. Elementor is more solid and limited, much more bloated, but it works with small and medium clients.

    My business strategy is to build websites together with clients so that they could add content and change minor things. For that reason I use Elementor. It brings me, happy clients.

    Elementor is just one single tool we use among a dozen, the builder is only one part of web design and development.

    If you’re a designer then go for Elementor. If you’re a developer then go for Oxygen. If your clients will be in the back end at all then Elementor.

    Elementor Pricing

    Out of the box, Oxygen is faster, but proper caching can make Elementor pretty quick.
    If you’ll constantly be building new pages, I think Elementor is easiest, but if you’re only building some pages to set and forget, Oxygen.

    Side note I can practically build an entire page in Elementor by the time Oxygens page builder loads. Both are great though. Oxegen is pretty much like WebFlow

    Elementor has a much larger user base and feels more user friendly for my average client. Oxygen probably has some performance benefits over Elementor but currently, I am able to get my Elementor sites loading fast and performing just fine.

    Elementor is also working on improving some things in the performance department I have heard. Oxygen has some more advanced ACF integration and a cool feature where you can build Gutenberg blocks with oxygen. Can’t go wrong with either. For most, I think Elementor is easier to use and more stable.

    Oxygen about 20% faster in the end. But we’re talking a normal site going from 0.9s load time to with oxygen 0.7s. And no you don’t need to be a developer to use it. Knowing the basic CSS terms is helpful. As with Elementor.

    Elementor has some nice performance features which are good for page speed and which oxygen does not have e. g. responsive background images with different image sizes for each device. Background images are often the biggest part of a site. You cannot have responsive images in oxygen yet.

    And it also has to be considered that people get faster internet speed from time to time. You can have a look at the development of internet speed in the past 10 years. 5g is also coming. Also, WordPress is getting better and better. Native Lazyload has been added with WordPress 5.5. And UX will matter more than the cleanness of code as long as your site is loading fast (under 2s).

    Nevertheless, I think oxygen and Elementor are both great tools and I use both of them. It is especially great in oxygen that you can work with classes and do not need to style repetitively if you want to change the style of the same elements with different content inside on different pages. Here you can find the best resource, which I have found on the internet, to optimize your pagespeed regardless if you use oxygen or Elementor.

    Visit Elementor.com

    Best answer
  7. I use both Oxygen and Elementor for different kinds of projects and I personally like both the builders as they both have their own PROS and CONS.

    I prefer to use Elementor if the client’s budget is low as building websites with Elementor is fast for me as I’m used to it for a long time now.

    But if a client has a good budget and they are looking for a fast performing website with clean code then I would prefer to use Oxygen as I can’t stop myself from loving it, especially for its great performance and CSS class system.

    I have written a comparison blog post about both the builders, you might wanna check it out as it can help you make your decision much easier:

    https://syncwin.com/blog/elementor-vs-oxygen/

  8. Oxygen Builder vs. Elementor vs. Divi:

    Oxygen is the best alternative to manually customize my own starter theme each time I need to build a new website. The comparison with Elementor vs Beaver Builder vs DIVI is a bit like apples and oranges, I like to think about Oxygen as a visual alternative to coding a theme by hand, useful for small/not critical projects.

    Even if Oxygen goes out of business I would still not use Elementor. and I think there is a niche of Oxygen users that are in this same boat.

    I also hope that Oxygen will not go down to the “page builder for designers” route, adding all those little fancy things like lists, galleries, etc., but stays focused on coders need.

  9. Oxygen Website Builder:

    I have always hated taking professional time to learn things that are revolutionary. When Oxygen was first introduced, I bought it, freaked out about the rawness and the learning curve, and put it away.

    Went back to themes with page builders (first Thrive, then Divi, then big E, then Gutenberg, then back to big E). Once I set aside a couple of dedicated days to use Oxygen, I learned how insanely powerful and fast it is. And now I can’t deal with a theme’s constraints.

    Oxygen is NOT perfect but it is a beautiful way to build sites, whether you add on something like Elementor or not.

    You build your own Gutenberg Blocks with Oxygen but build your content in Gutenberg. This has the advantage that design changes within blocks need to be done only once and not for every single page. And content creators can’t break your structural elements. Additionally, I got WPStackable. For smaller websites without many pages and without frequent posts and updates LiveCanvas is interesting.

    Oxygen Website Builder

  10. I think pagebuilder choice is a bit subjective and should be tailored for your workflow. My personal preference is for Oxygen Builder. I worked with Beaver on several occasions and found it quite challenging to do things that should have been really simple. I’ll grant that could have been due to a lack of familiarity with the builder, but I rarely had such problems with Elementor Page Builder. It’s layout fit my natural workflow almost perfectly.

    Oxygen Builder Review:

    Oxygen Builder is by far the quickest way to build a layout. I’d say Elementor makes sites with slightly better designs. Hard to explain but things like nav menus are immediately more flexible and offer things like transitions for hover effects rather than on/off. Not sure I’m explaining it right. I still don’t know if I’m comfortable with there not being a theme with Oxygen. And Elementor has lots more widgets but I can see Oxygen catching up pretty quickly. For a site start to finish where the budget is low and the deadline is tight, I’m now using Oxygen. I’ve built two sites in the last couple of days already.

    Elementor Page Builder Review:

    Elementor is best as it is easy to use and its plus point is that elementor gives you 28 widgets and elementor pro gives you extra 30 new widgets. Elementor is easy to use and it has great reviews as compared to Beaver Builder Plugin. Whereas Beaver Builder gives you just 6 modules and with the premium version you can get 30.. Although it also gives you a full width preview design and Elementor gives you sidebar from where you drag and drop. So Elementor Builder is far better then Beaver Builder But Oxegen Builder is faster and has clean html output which helps SEO more.

    Oxygen Builder vs Elementor Page Builder:

    If you want to depend with your development on something like Elementor that’s fine. Oxygen is a gateway to learning to code for yourself with the ability to speed the process up and now with Gutenberg Blocks – allow your customer to make changes easily and safely. Way cheaper as it’s truly lifetime and you get all the future upgrades not like with many other companies. But you have to be willing to learn to code too. Whatever you build using Oxygen you will be able to apply to learn and build your own WP themes etc. Easily. With Elementor you will forever depend on them or someone like them. Choice is yours to make. I personally will use most of the tools for variety of reasons and different customer’s needs. I truly recommend learning as much as one can.

  11. You don’t need to know coding, but there is the opportunity built in to use coding to get design elements exactly how you want. I have used Oxygen 2 for some pretty cool sites without using any coding, but like that I could.

    Normally, it would be better HTML, but since you need just a basic knowledge, then I guess both at the same time is alright… You need more CSS than HTML, since you don’t need to write HTML, but it just helps you to know which tag to target (ex: you want to modify a link, then it’s a…) it’s almost only what you “need” to know… need being just “preferable” than really needed…

    Again, it’s not “required” at all, but would just give you a little advantage over someone who doesn’t know anything…

    A good place to go is W3schools where you have reference and tutorials on HTML, CSS and JavaScript… Just knowing how to find what you’re looking for is all the knowledge that you really need…

  12. If you’re a designer then Elementor. If you’re a developer then Oxygen. If your clients will be in the back end at all then Elementor.

    Out of the box, Oxygen Builder is faster, but proper caching can make Elementor pretty quick.
    If you’ll constantly be building new pages, I think Elementor is easiest, but if you’re only building some pages to set and forget, Oxygen.

    Side note I can practically build an entire page in Elementor by the time Oxygens page builder loads. Both are great.

    They are both excellent. Elementor has a much larger user base and feels more user friendly for my average client. Oxygen probably has some performance benefits over Elementor but currently, I am able to get my Elementor sites loading fast and performing just fine. Elementor is also working on improving some things in the performance department I have heard. Oxygen has some more advanced ACF integration and a cool feature where you can build Gutenberg blocks with oxygen. Can’t go wrong with either. For most, I think Elementor is easier to use and more stable.

    Get Your Copy Of Elementor with Discount

    0

    My business strategy is to build websites together with clients so that they could add content and change minor things. For that reason I use elementor. It brings me, happy clients.

    I came back from oxygen to elementor because my clients use to break the oxygen sites. oxygen is very powerful, but still full of bugs after 2 years of working with it. Elementor is more solid and limited, much more bloated, but it works with small and medium clients

    Elementor is just one single tool we use among a dozen, the builder is only one part of web design and development.

    Elementor Page Builder Features

     

  13. I would suggest building the one page twice, using a different page builder each time, and figure out which one you’re more comfortable with. I tried Oxygen and Elementor, the latter of which can be installed as a free plugin with basic functionality. With Oxygen, you can try it on their website, where they have a full featured version running on a virtual machine with a lot of sample sites.

  14. So I see a lot of people saying you need to know HTML, CSS, etc… to use Oxygen Builder but after going through all of the tutorials I feel like I could use Oxygen fairly easily but I do not know code at all… am I missing something? Just curious before purchasing.

  15. I’ve owned a license for Oxygen for about 6 months.

    Made two attempts to build sites. Found it was taking 10x longer than with Elementor. That’d be just a learning curve though.

    Only a handful of templates to use. Wasn’t sure about its compatibility with some plugins.

    So at the moment it’s in the too hard bracket.

  16. I honestly never lost a single moment with other builders.
    As a developing company, we never used builders. We started checking them as we focused up our mind on lower budget projects’ real costs.

    Plus: oxygen is a game changer. It’s not “put in some crap and go”: it still is performance effective and has a lot on attention on coding. It’s kind of professionally risky to lean on third parties instruments, but lifetime support is surely reassuring. And the fact that you can actually use wp code and hooks in the templates is a major plus.
    The granularity of it all, so to say, and the “reusable parts” and “templates” applying to specific hierarchies.

    Cons: there’s still much to work in terms of ease of use and flexibility. For example yootheme, which was our other choice, relies heavily on the wonderful uikit framework, and looks real good (fyi: i imported uikit as a library in oxygen, no conflicts apparently).
    When you put content on a column it sometimes appear unclear where you’re putting it – i sometimes have this issue. Yootheme is built around customizer and – though with much lesser control – the “structure” panel is awesome – very confortable to use.

    As i wrote to the (very kind) customer service, i’d like to see a dynamic post slider as well.

    The only thing i pray on my knees the staff keeps is NOT TO CRAM IT WITH EVERY SINGLE FEATURE IN THE WORLD. One thing i hate about visual composer, to name one, is that it has EVERYTHING.
    Oxygen is built also with coders in mind. PRETTY PLEASE KEEP THIS APPROACH

  17. Still experimenting with it, but so far with what I’ve been playing with, Oxygen has better theme building capabilities than Elementor.

    Oxygen feels more like the advance users power tool to get things done, which is great. However, as far as reaching a broad market, it may be harder to catch non-pro users that may not be familiar with HTML, CSS, and JS.

    I think right now, power users like myself will really get some enjoyment and use out of it, and you really can’t argue with the price. As long as there are continuous improvements and development to it, it should be amongst the top 3 builders.

  18. If you want to depend with your development on something like Elementor that’s fine. Oxygen is a gateway to learning to code for yourself with the ability to speed the process up and now with Gutenberg Blocks – allow your customer to make changes easily and safely. Way cheaper as it’s truly lifetime and you get all the future upgrades not like with many other companies. But you have to be willing to learn to code too. Whatever you build using Oxygen you will be able to apply to learn and build your own WP Themes etc. Easily. With Elementor you will forever depend on them or someone like them. Choice is yours to make. I personally will use most of the tools for variety of reasons and different customer’s needs. I truly recommend learning as much as one can.

Leave an answer

Choose from here the video type.

Put here the video id : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdUUx5FdySs Ex: 'sdUUx5FdySs'.

What is the capital of USA? ( Washington )